I had pondering time on my hands today at hospital in Bath, recovering from a minor operation. It went swimmingly, all well thank you - let's just say it was an old bloke issue. I was very grateful to be in the hands of Mr. Courtney and not Jacob Rees-Mogg,
Mystic Meg or Michael Gove. Perhaps we do need experts, after all.
Certainly Breitbart don't. Scribbler James Delingpole has written regularly on climate change
in this news organ. Like many things in the post truth era, he seems to see climate change as some kind of political opinion - which he doesn't like in this instance. He is in hot water with that subversive left wing political news outlet, the Weather Channel, for misrepresenting them
in his most recent article. Weather.com are furious. Looking at the video of an exasperated weather forecaster and reading their response, you've got to admit they have a point.
Driven Grouse Shooting
Hen Harrier (Image: RSPB)
On a much smaller scale there is a similar conflation of entrenched political views and "scientific facts" going on in the conservation world about driven grouse shooting. Unsurprisingly the Left hate it and the Right love it. I'm no expert (!), but there is good evidence that raptors are puzzlingly absent from grouse moors, including rare species like Hen Harriers.
In some quarters this has just been denied point blank
. Keepers are shooting a lot of Mountain Hares
, and there's little doubt that grouse moors contribute to flooding.
There was an article
on this by Matt Ridley in The Spectator which included some apparently spurious statistics
to support his view. He claims that these moorlands are better at retaining water than forests. Better than spruce plantations possibly, but generally no, this is complete nonsense. The government itself has recently acknowledged this by announcing a £15 million tree planting programme as part of its flood prevention strategy.
The whole issue has fallen victim to shouty Delingpole style politics. If Matt Ridley sees an insidious left wing plot, then George Monbiot sees it as an example of the establishment elite trampling the people. It turns out Paul Dacre (Daily Mail editor) owns a grouse moor. Chris Packham is unhappy with the shooters and the shooters are certainly unhappy with Chris Packham, who they think is a metro luvvie who doesn't understand country pursuits. And so it goes on.
It is more important than ever for experts and proper journalists to be precise and informative about conservation and environmental issues. They must also avoid confirmation bias. The rest of us to have to amplify good information via social media.
Different Bees Please
To take a small but nonetheless annoying example, I would say the MAJORITY of articles I read about bees on Facebook confuse honeybees with solitary bees and bumblebees
. They're often also illustrated with a photo of a hoverfly. People are interested in bees and want to do the right thing for them, but end up confused. They sign petitions purporting to be about all bees which are actually about honeybees. They share helpful Facebook posts about feeding dying bumblebee workers in autumn and funny cartoons about how good bees are and how bad wasps are. People spend hours making bumblebee nesters - which don't work - rather than solitary bee nesters
- which do. We should be following the Bee experts.